Home Industry Insurance and capital markets From price comparison to the l...
Insurance And Capital Markets
CIO Bulletin,
07 July, 2026
Author:
Guest
The insurance industry is currently investing billions in digitalisation, artificial intelligence and automation. Modern pricing systems optimise existing tariffs, comparison platforms create market transparency, and AI systems help customers who are looking for information.
Despite these advances, however, one key question remains largely unresolved: How can one understand competitors’ pricing logic and market behaviour without having to access their internal data or systems?
Competitors’ prices and product logic influence margins, growth, market share and customer
loyalty on a daily basis. At the same time, they remain largely a black box for insurers, reinsurers, platforms and intermediaries.
Comparison tools show prices. However, they do not reveal why these prices are set. They do not reveal the rules, risk models, product decisions or strategic considerations behind them. They do not reveal how competitors react to market changes, how rates change over time, or how individual providers assess different customer groups.
It is precisely here that a new category of market infrastructure could currently emerge.
Most of the solutions available today can be broadly divided into four categories.
Comparison tools provide transparency regarding current prices and products. They answer the question: “Which provider is currently cheaper?” However, they do not answer: “Why is this provider cheaper?”
Many market participants have access to APIs from insurers or aggregate market data from partnerships. This data is valuable. However, it usually only allows for the analysis of historical or aggregated market information. The underlying logic of individual providers generally remains hidden.
Benchmarking, analysis and rating solutions provide transparency regarding market positions and differences in performance. However, the actual pricing logic behind the prices remains largely invisible.
Modern pricing platforms are among the most powerful tools in the industry. They help insurers optimise their own tariffs and incorporate market data into decision-making processes.
However, the competitive landscape remains largely observation-based. The underlying mechanisms of other market participants are not reconstructed.
Generative AI is currently one of the most impressive technologies in existence. In the coming years, large language models will be increasingly integrated into the insurance industry – as digital assistants, advisers, intermediaries or AI agents.
However, what language models do not automatically possess is independent market intelligence. A language model does not, by itself, know how a particular insurer assesses risks, what pricing logic underlies a tariff, or how competitors will react to market changes. An LLM requires knowledge. The real challenge, therefore, lies in generating this knowledge in the first place. This is precisely where the difference between language models and market models lies. LLMs can utilise market intelligence. However, they cannot replace it.
A new generation of technologies is therefore taking a different approach. Instead of merely
collecting prices or connecting to interfaces, market models are being built that reconstruct the pricing logic and behaviour underlying observable prices.
The central idea is: Don’t observe the market – model the market.
This gives rise to what are known as market twins. Much like digital twins in industry, they aim to replicate real-world systems as accurately as possible. The difference is that it is not machines that are modelled, but markets.
This opens up new possibilities:
As a result, insurance markets are becoming machine-readable on a large scale for the first time.
In the capital markets, Bloomberg fundamentally transformed trading when market information became structured, searchable, available in real time and machine-readable. A similar
development may now also become relevant for insurance markets. Not because insurance products are becoming simpler, but because new technologies are increasingly capable of modelling their complexity.
The crucial question is: What happens when market logic becomes as readily available as market prices are today?
The implications would extend far beyond traditional comparison websites or chatbot interfaces. A new operational layer of market intelligence is emerging, supporting pricing, product development, sales and AI applications equally.
The most immediate benefit of centralised market intelligence lies in pricing and product
development. Once the logic behind competitors’ prices becomes clear, insurers can identify more quickly:
Instead of static price comparisons, a dynamic understanding of the market emerges. This opens up potential for faster product development, shorter time-to-market cycles, better margins and more informed strategic decisions.
A second area of application concerns AI agents. Today, many AI systems answer questions based on general information. With underlying market intelligence, significantly deeper
interactions could emerge in future. For example: ‘I only drive at the weekend. Which offers suit my profile?’ or ‘Why is offer A more expensive than offer B?’
The AI would not merely describe products. It could explain market mechanisms in a way that is easy to understand. This gives rise to a new form of digital advice.
The underlying market intelligence remains the same. Only the application changes.
Possible areas of application range from high-speed metasearch systems for insurance, through competitive reaction simulators, to sales support for field staff and brokers, product generators or market sandboxes for other sectors such as banking, energy or leasing.
No. Language models can utilise and explain existing knowledge. However, the actual market intelligence must first be generated. Market models and LLMs therefore complement rather than compete with one another.
Not necessarily. New modelling approaches are deliberately designed to understand market mechanisms independently of direct interfaces. This is precisely where a significant step forward in innovation lies.
In principle, yes. In practice, however, this involves considerable development risk. Market
models of this kind require years of development work, extensive system and market validation, and significant investment. Consequently, such infrastructure assets rarely become available externally at all.
The next stage of development in the insurance industry is unlikely to lie in better price comparisons or better chatbots. Rather, it will lie in systems that understand the pricing logic and the behaviour behind the prices.
This approach gives rise to a new form of infrastructure for insurance markets – one that can support pricing, products, sales and AI applications in equal measure.
For insurers, reinsurers, broker pools, tech and software companies, banks, consultants and other market participants, this raises an increasingly strategic question: Who will control the market intelligence layer underlying AI-powered insurance systems in the future?
The answer to this question is likely to shape the industry more significantly in the coming years than the question of the next chatbot.
finsago develops AI-based market intelligence infrastructure for insurance markets. Its technology reconstructs the pricing logic and behavior behind competitors’ prices and can be deployed as a white-box solution for strategic partners.
Learn more: finsago.com








Comments